The Trump "Hush" Money Trial

The Trump "Hush" Money Trial

In a stunning twist that sounds more like a plot out of Hollywood than the halls of justice, former U.S. President Trump is currently on trial for an alleged misuse of funds—funds purportedly used to ensure the movie Hush was never screened in the White House. Why, you might ask? It appears he harbored an inexplicable fear of deaf people in horror movies!

According to sources close to the matter, the Former President, renowned for his scandalous reign, viewed the prospect of a deaf protagonist surviving horrors not just as unlikely, but downright terrifying. The thought of a horror film where the main character, who is deaf, outsmarts the villain using skills beyond ordinary hearing was reportedly too much for his delicate sensibilities.

99 Problems and the Stormy One

Buy Our "99 Problems and the Stormy One" T-Shirt Now

The saga began when one of his aides, during a late-night Netflix browse, accidentally queued up Hush—a horror flick featuring a deaf protagonist fighting off a masked intruder. Witnesses claim the former leader of the free world panicked, causing a scene that involved several overturned bowls of popcorn and a frantic call to his then-lawyer, famously referred to as 'the fixer'.

The fixer's testimony, now central to the case, suggests that a hefty sum was siphoned off emergency entertainment funds to 'handle the horror movie situation'. This operation wasn't just about skipping a movie night; it was an elaborate effort involving bribes to staff members to forever ban any movie with deaf characters from the White House media room.

"Why fear a deaf heroine?" pondered a psychologist during the trial, sparking a media frenzy. Fans of horror and advocates for the deaf community alike are baffled and amused by the revelations. The hashtag #SilentButDeadly has gone viral, with social media users creating memes showing the Former President cowering from various fictional deaf heroes.

In court, the prosecution presented a bewildering array of evidence, including text messages between President Trump and his fixer, discussing "that scary silent movie" and how it was imperative to "keep such terrors out of sight and sound."

As the trial unfolds, spectators are treated to a daily dose of absurdity. From aides testifying about secret movie screenings to heated debates over the portrayal of disability in film, the courtroom has turned into a theater of the bizarre.

Legal experts speculate that the case could set a precedent for what they're calling 'Cinematic Sensitivity Misappropriation'. Meanwhile, the defense argues that their client was merely exercising his executive right to choose entertainment that wouldn't "scare him silly."

As this cinematic saga continues, one thing remains clear: in the world of politics and horror, sometimes truth is stranger—and funnier—than fiction. Stay tuned as we bring you more updates from what is quickly becoming known as the trial of the century, where the only thing scarier than a horror movie is the legal drama unfolding before our eyes.

Back to blog